It reaaaaally looks like you're passing the blame, though. I mean, you're replying to someone who said that he doubts that it was 100% fault and you're contradicting him. I think that, in principle, blaming Opalium for the crashes isn't even wrong considering they didn't happen before he changed things and now they do happen, but the fact that you keep mentioning that the crashes only started happening when he changed the code while also saying that you're not trying to pass blame seems pretty dishonest. Pass blame or don't, but don't lie about not passing blame. If it wasn't your intention to make it sound like it's Opalium's fault (and you're probably going to claim it wasn't your intention whether you are dishonest or not), then you should read all the things you said and think about how outsiders could interpret them. Guess what: Everyone thinks it's Opalium's fault after they read what you wrote. I wonder why! It's not like you are 100% pointing at the fact! Maybe it's just a language barrier and "passing the blame" doesn't just mean "blaming someone", but "blaming someone even though you're at fault"? If it's the latter, ignore everything I just said lol Principles aren't usually assumptions about what other people think, but okay. One of my principles is that you like vanilla ice-cream. No, because it won't change anything and I don't really care either way. If you were willing to listen to what the result of my poll would be, then you'd also be willing to make a poll yourself. I'm not here to convince you to keep the server. You can delete it if you want to because that is your right. I am just saying that some of the reasoning you are giving us makes no sense to me. I'd be happier with a simple "I'm not in the mood to run the server anymore". People would be way more willing to accept that. This might as well be a real thing that a person would say on this forum unironically, if it weren't for the last paragraph and the sheeple line.