For example, you are person A. You warp person B in your claim, but him being a punk ass bi- traitor, he contacts person C and he warps him in. Person C kills you, now he is also inside of your house. This should be like: Person C wants to teleport to person B in your claimed area. [command] to accept teleportation, [command] to deny. This should only happen to people who are in your claim and NOT trusted, if he is trusted you will take responsibility for this and it's technically fair game.
If you can't enderpearl into claimed land then I think it's silly that you can teleport into it or have someone teleport into it unless you've been trusted at some level
https://www.seriousgmod.com/threads/tpa-protection-tpa-trust-in-claims.36885/ Obviously this is not related to your the claim holder has to /tpaccept also. But this is - https://www.seriousgmod.com/threads/the-simple-solution.36974/#post-338918 Now, I can see this going 3 ways - PvE players get what they want and can't be touched in their land. PvP players are sulking like children because they can't get inside people's domes. And lastly, Friendships destroyed because someone like Mankamal pays a /trust friend of yours off (counts as land owner I believe) and they try to lie their ass off so you dont hate them, but deep down you know what they did and when they get offline you /untrust them and /kick from party. So with all this said from my point of view. +1 I dont mind, just means that they will have to make chorus fruit an accepted strategy to get into bases I think.
I think this fair compromise between PvP'ers and non-PvP'ers. To be fair however, I think non-PvP players are going to choose to allow TPA'ing in to a claim rather than accepting chorus fruit.