Ok so the most basic and prevalent definition of RDM is killing without reason. This post derives from a series of instances where I RDMed someone with a legitimate reason but was slain for it because either because the Mod was too lazy to fully investigate It or went simply by the thought that a team kill is a team kill and should be punished. Purely I want to open up the way we look at RDMs to a more circumstantial approach. If someone has a claim, and there is evidence to support it, he should live, not be slain in the same way as someone who would just go up to a teammate and shoot him point blank in the face for the fun of it. feedback would be appreciated. :|
