Lets take example of a scene. You hear gun shots (either same type like shotgun vs shotgun or 2 types like shotgun vs automatic gun) and you follow the sounds. You come to scene, A and B terrorists killing each other, tho only looking at them, confused who is who. So you say on microphone "idk who is who so I dont interfere" and either go away, or stay till one of them is dead and wait for response of the other person. If the other person shoots you, you kill them, solving the case who is prob T without risking karma down (but sometimes its rdmer and gg u prob get killed cus people came into scene when u killed rdmer) OR he checks body, its inno, now oyu have chance killing him or not, but you rather dont do it, as it could be the person that died first is a RDMER and the other dude was just doing self-protection. So you rather dont kill the other person, that checked body and doesnt shoot at you, resulting that you have bad rep from some long-lasting players in server for ME being a GBA player. Is it better killing them just both, risking loss of karma, but not being accused of being GBA player OR just rather do it in a way, that you wont risk having karma loss? Is both options good sometimes? I am really questioning myself as the rules stays what GBA player is, that he should be KOSed, but I see that there are cases where you likely shouldnt shoot on GBA player unless you see A or B terrorists players shooting each other didnt do another T action (like one is shooting from traitor room or having harpoon that they didnt acknowledged other players they have in possesion).... you get the gist.