I am aware of the unreliable nature of demos, which is why I included my own demos for comparison. Demos are 32 tick. Only person who I am extremely doubtful was cheating was McPenis. But then again, he was called out by multiple people while we were playing earlier, so I had to make a report, as no mod was on at the time to deal with any of the people I have reported.
Demos may be inconsistent in their depiction of a POV from a player, as they do show full recoil, or they may de-sync a bit. Still, I only captured demos of people I believed could very possibly be cheating, despite the lacking power demos hold as evidence. If the staff do not take this into account during reports, that is their own fault.
The 6% slowdown is only a recommendation. Mods are free to do whatever they please with the demos and take adequate action with what is presented to them. Such being said, I will see it that those who are indeed cheating will be punished. Reports are a means of assessing that.
I also want to add that there is almost always a lag when spectating players. What i mean is, if player a is walking with an ak, as a spectator player a could be at position 120, 120, 120, but player b (the guy you are spectating) is shooting a bit to the left or a bit to the right. Player b is seeing him at 100,120,100. If youre confused by what im trying to say ill try to find a different example
Thats why alot of the time when players you spectate are shooting to the left or right, its bc they are seeing them there.
This is also why while spectating, you will sometimes see player a shoot at player b, when player b is rounding a corner. Player b is all the way around the corner for you, the spectator, but player a is still able to shoot player b.
Silent aimbot isnt always the thing either. Its uncommon to see players use a silent aimbot, as most you have to pay for or make yourself. Read above as to why silent aimbot isnt always the thing
Comments on Profile Post by Elvis