The Portable tester is: press e to get tested, if you're inno/detective, it says ''Texas is proven from tester, being innocent!'' and being a traitor is ''Texas is a traitor, KOS TEXAS!'' it has 1 use. and it is not mandatory.
I feel like it should be kinda like Texas said, where it will say it. I think it should have like a 2-3 time use. Then after which it destroys itself. Or even better, explodes. Can maybe add something, where a T can actually do something with it to make it say Traitor like some T testers on some maps. +1
The you can't put people in places where it's life or death situation if it proves them a t or not, that includes t testers. In the past community the amount of targeting with this was stupidly immense. And with this community, and the non regulars and how they treat people, it's gonna happen.
To recap: Single use, one credit Portable Player must consent (or else it's tester rape) If all of these criteria are not met, -1 If they are, +1 90% of maps do not have testers either. That's a wild assumption. Most people denying this suggestion because Texas suggested it. Shame
Actually, last I heard, they were, as if you put an afk t in one, they are as good as dead. if I'm wrong, a admin+ can inform us.
You know to make this tester work you have to actually press E on it as an innocent so theres no way you could force someone to test.
You can't force players to test, inno or not This is mainly for Innos to prove to Detectives that they are inno and can trust them
Ttt is supposed to be finding clues, and using them to your advantage. A portable tester just wouldn’t be fun and doesn’t fit ttt imo
Players have a choice for using them tho. You could just run up to anyone and shoot them for being a t with this suggestion
That rule is more for people pushing other people into areas where they are forced to die as innocent or live as a traitor and be potentially kosed/killed. As for the testers, they are not included in this situation because the testers don't automatically kill them. Anybody can live. We can test the afk t and leave him alone. If the afk turns out to be innocent, we don't have to worry about it.
Having it force test would be the WORST possible way to go with this. I would HATE to be afk for a bit if the round as t only to die bc of a det forcing me to test.
Last thing ill say before going off topic ???? But please, dont add this, or more importantly, dont make it force test.
This would be a great cause in non-tester maps like dolls & teenroom. Then we won't have to proppush the afks into the wilderness @Off the ledges of the map. I support this +1