Reference https://www.seriousgmod.com/threads/powerpoint12345s-appeal.54475/ So Aegis's reply really has me off put to be honest. PowerPoint clearly had a gore spray, and was warned by Nuno to change it. After doing so, he was banned by a second moderator, Aegis. Why is one moderator overriding the punishment/warning of another? I'd be pissed off as hell if I received a warning and complied, just to be banned afterwards. It seems like Aegis thought the warning wasn't good enough and decided to ban anyway. Seeing nothing to the contrary, it seems like Aegis decided that they were more senior or had the authority to override Nuno. So this really boils down to: In what priority do moderators punish? This is a pretty clear case of two mods enforcing the same issue with different results. Warning first, complied, then banned. I know the sprays don't require the warning, but this really doesn't pass the sniff test.