https://i.imgur.com/SDZZqEJ.png "If you call out to a player that they are the last inno alive without sufficient warning and agreement with teammates, you are responsible for any kills they make as a result." This is a rule in the miscellaneous section. I assume this is for situations when there's multiple traitors alive, and 1 innocent. This rule would blame the traitor who informed the last innocent, and therefore that traitor would be at blame for any other traitors killed by that innocent. So, imagine this situation. There 5 players left alive, 1 of 5 is a traitor. Traitor tells Inno#1 they're the "last innocent alive". Inno#1 kills Inno#2, #3, and #4. Did Inno#1 rdm or is that a valid strategy from the traitor? If the traitor is held responsible, this would mean that a Traitor could convince a player they are the last inno, and that any kills made by them would not be rdm because the traitor is responsible. This would not work if there's proof that a detective is alive (like the "last innocent" seeing the detective or hearing them talk in voice chat)
