Answered Have the outlines for metagaming changed?

Discussion in 'Questions & Answers' started by neutral, Mar 14, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. neutral

    neutral VIP

    Had this interaction with @Heli12345 on the innomotel earlier:

    [​IMG]

    Previously on SGM- this has been considered a valid tactic since innocents commonly kill each other in the T-room so it's a good way to weed out the innocents. So given that I warned my T-buddies before letting people in the T-room- I'm confused on how letting innocents in the T room can be considered metagaming. Especially since the direct objective is to kill the other team, progressing the traitor's objective.

    If the guidelines for metagaming has changed, there should be some notification to the community letting them know that this rule is being altered from the rule set. Can we get some clarification on whether this scenario constitutes as metagaming, and if so, how is metagaming now being defined seeing as this is different from the past administrations.

    Thank you. :)
     
  2. Agent Knockout

    Agent Knockout The Last Stand Moderator VIP

    I am fairly certain it is not considered metagaming if there was a good warning beforehand.
     
  3. MangoTango

    MangoTango The Best Is Yet To Come VIP Silver Emerald

    This is correct. I'll make sure that's reiterated to our team.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.