Denied FreakinJose's Appeal

Discussion in 'TTT Ban Appeals' started by FreakinJose, Aug 4, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Your In Game Nickname:
    FreakinJose
    Your Steam ID:
    STEAM_1:1:80420178
    Which Server:
    Vanilla
    Why you should be unbanned:
    After discussing with Pacifist and his Moderator about this situation, I do not feel it is justified to give me a 60 day ban. Discussed from this thread, my spray was considered to be borderline by the Moderator Nyra. After talking to Pacifist, his opinion was that he would not go above Nyra's verdict, but says that the spray is not considered pornography to him.

    Original spray removed, considered "pornography."
    https://www.seriousgmod.com/threads/report-against-nyra.49610/
    Evidence of Innocence:

     
  2. neutral

    neutral Banned VIP

    Heya,

    Sorry for the confusion. There was some misplacement in the ban- I just fixed it. Nyra banned you for Porn Spray (4th offense). Although protocol was broken slightly, the ban was still valid. I have fixed the ban to the appropriate 32w punishment.

    Tagging @Nyra to handle the appeal
     
  3. Miss Alice

    Miss Alice winky face VIP

    As we went over before, there was a shared opinion about what could be seen in the picture, whether it's just a misconception or not. You've ignored staff members' warnings in the past about using inappropriate sprays and then ignored mine too, and I don't feel like you have very much respect for the server. Your appeal's denied, refer to our conversation for evidence.
     
  4. My issue is your stand on this. I explained myself that this isn't a pornography spray, and it isn't trying to be pornography. There were sprays at the time with facial reactions of sexual pleasure, but those were ignored and the only one focused was mine.
    As for times before, that was more than 5 to 6 months ago and I don't see how they are relevant to this situation. This ban did not happen right after another and that's one of the issues thats frustrating.
     
  5. Miss Alice

    Miss Alice winky face VIP

    Meant to lock this. Anyway, there was nothing else on the server that could actually be perceived as a sexual organ, which was the whole point. A face isn't enough, neither is an overweight furry picture.

    As for your other bans being relevant, you're right they wouldn't usually be considered given how long ago they were, but there's a lot of them, and it shows a clear habit of not taking a hint.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.