Denied Electronized's Appeal

Discussion in 'TTT Ban Appeals' started by Electronized, Jul 22, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Your In Game Nickname:
    Electronized
    Your Steam ID:
    STEAM_0:1:104199286
    Which Server:
    EU
    Why you should be unbanned:
    Well, here we go eh?

    SB:
    I literally posted a link, not a picture or anything of that kind, to educate the one and only MiGGO about something. 7 DAYS for that. That's weird.

    Servers:
    You banned me for 4 weeks.
    1. Ghosting
    PMing someone with an invalid KOS (It's Reaper) when you've just fucking joined is not ghosting. Reaper is what? The T, the only remaining innocent, the D, the one who opened the door?
    2. To-haha-xic gameplay.
    Purely because you're too lazy to make this server noob-friendlier.
    Purely because you're tired of me saying 'It's (X)' and KO5/KOZ.
    Yet you do slay people for following invalid KOS's. (I.E Callum, thrice)
    At least be consistent, either punish the invalid KOS'er, or punish the guy following the KOS.
    If you're truly tired of the invalid KOSings, make a straightforward rule about it, don't hide behind such a vague little rule.
    Also, from an anonymous source, Rhienor to You: watch Electronized dont say anything
    Rhienor to You: but just wait

    Out of all of this, the SB ban seems the weirdest to me, 7 days for a single link. ONE SINGLE LINK. As if we have 5 year old children in SB, not to mention it wasn't random at all, since the conversation was already about strapons and dildo's.

    Am I toxic sometimes? Yeah, that's true, am a bit of a keyboard warrior. I think multiple staff member can testify to that, and my permanently banned LoL account.
    Am I not toxic sometimes? Yes.
    Do people enjoy playing with me? Absolutely.
    Do some people hate me? Hell yes.
    Is a 4 week long, globalized ban (and the ban on SB) justified? No.

    I truly have nothing to say anymore, if you get a kick/pleasure from banning me, ban me for 2 weeks Tuesday.
    Evidence of Innocence:

     
  2. Acnologia

    Acnologia modern desperado VIP Silver

    Tagging @Agent A for the in-game ban.
     
  3. Acnologia

    Acnologia modern desperado VIP Silver

    As well as @HelixSpiral for the Shoutbox ban. Sorry, should've included this above, but tags that get edited in don't notify the tagged individual.
     
  4. neutral

    neutral Banned VIP

    Hey Electronized,

    I don't have much to repeat from what we already discussed in private message. You came off of a one day ban last night for the continual harassment against Timo.

    You then, violated the no porn/disturbing content rule within less than 24 hrs. For obvious reasons, I won't post the screenshot here but it was a subreddit that, while kind of relevant to the conversation, was still incredibly graphic.

    Due to the proximity to your previous ban, and the seriousness of the offense for this ban, your appeal is denied.

    You are more than welcome as always to message me, although I do ask and suggest that you are a bit more cordial than the last message you sent me where you asked me to prepare my anus for this report.

    I'll let Agent A address your in server ban.
     
  5. Agent A

    Agent A Veni, vidi, vici VIP Silver Emerald

    So let's get down to this.

    For the first ban, it was for a mixture of reasons.
    You were warned by @Han Solo for fake koses as seen here.
    Then you pulled a similar stunt with targeting @Timo654 , which you admitted in this report.

    Thus, I placed a 1 day globalized toxicity/toxic gameplay ban.

    However, you chose to not learn from your ban.
    Once you were banned for the first time, you chose to make these statements.
    When you were unbanned, I was informed by @Rhienor that you chose to continue to make fake koses as seen in this screenshot.
    Furthermore, I was given a screenshot by @Malcom T to check for potential ghosting.

    After doing some comparison with the screenshot and old log, it was deemed by @HelixSpiral and me that it was ghosting since both Malcom T and Reaper were both alive when you decided to do this.


    You were giving information that Malcom T might not know via a third party communications (psay) about Reaper that he could've act upon it.

    Considering your actions, I'm going to deny this ban appeal. Take this ban to learn from your actions.

    Appeal: Denied.

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.