There's nothing wrong with the spelling on that post. I stand by this one, my spelling is still fine, no matter how invalid the statement was.
Actually, last I checked it just adds an extra blip; it doesn't remove a person's blip. So you're wrong.
That is incorrect, as I do this, all the time. If you have a decoy, your blip is with it, not on your person. I do not speak on a topic if it is not something I have experienced myself. My side-hoe Death and I tested it, I was mistaken/wrong.
Would you like to get online for demonstration? Because my eyes see just fine. I've been given enough reason to doubt myself, but not enough to convince me I'm wrong, as I'm still quite sure I've done this before, and had it done to me. My side-hoe Death and I tested it, I was mistaken/wrong.
I wouldn't mind if the Decoy self-destructed or de-activated, but letting people get DNA from it with a scanner is a big NO from me.
It just doesn't make sense for an object meant to distract the detective from you, to allow a detective to discern your identity. Why should it show DNA?
