Invalid Report against saint

Discussion in 'TTT Staff/Player Reports' started by Tea♥, May 19, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tea♥

    Tea♥ VIP

    Name of Staff/Player:
    saint
    Steam ID of Staff/Player:
    STEAM_0:1:64162054
    Your Steam ID:
    No.
    Which Server:
    Vanilla
    Which Map:
    no
    Which Round:
    no
    Time of Occurence:
    no
    Reason For Report:
    cheating.​
    Evidence And/Or Witnesses:
    demo

    some snaps, should be clear, can upload more if needed​
     
  2. Pokeben10

    Pokeben10 tell me pretty lies Moderator VIP Silver

    While there is a small snap that is a little suspicious, I do not believe this to be sufficient evidence to ban for hacking. If an admin would like to watch the demo and overrule me, then so be it.

    Report: Invalid
     
  3. Pokeben10

    Pokeben10 tell me pretty lies Moderator VIP Silver

    Would you be able to provide a little more evidence?
     
  4. Tea♥

    Tea♥ VIP

    Should've asked if I had more evidence, considering you guys take absurdly long to reply to my reports anyway.

    2nd demo, I'll add points as I see them.
     
  5. Tea♥

    Tea♥ VIP

    1st kill at the very beginning of the demo is obvious aimbot, or the "snap" like you described. The aimbot he's using doesn't seem to perfectly lock on the hitbox, it's more like aim-assist that doesn't compensate for recoil.

    2nd-3rd kills ~2500 ticks are onafks, nothing too suspicious but worth looking at as it explains what I said.

    4th kill is at ~7600 ticks and not long after that he starts shooting another afk for the 5th.

    Probably some kind of aim-assist that's meant to conceal cheats, or this person is just good at toggling his aim when he needs it. You can see the last shots on slap are pretty clear evidence along with the 1st kill, of what's going on here.
     
  6. Tea♥

    Tea♥ VIP

    Another thing I'd like to mention is his aimbot targets the nearest target by reticle. We can see this at ~3000 ticks. Clearly, he'd want to shoot unamazing cake here. Even though austin was further away, they were closer to his crosshair, so that's why he'd fired a stray shot at him. Also, there was more than one "snap" in that clip if you payed attention, as he killed 4 people.
     
  7. Reda-Lex

    Reda-Lex sup, China ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)/ Administrator VIP

    I'll handle this report from now.
     
  8. Reda-Lex

    Reda-Lex sup, China ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)/ Administrator VIP

    Do you have more demo?

    For the first demo, it does look very fishy, but not enough for a Hacking ban.
    For the second demo, i can't see anything weird.
     
  9. Tea♥

    Tea♥ VIP

    You can't? besides the 1st kill, which was obvious aimlock, and the kill on slaps, which also was aimlock? I don't see how else someone got 13 kills with an m16 without cheating, too
     
  10. Reda-Lex

    Reda-Lex sup, China ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)/ Administrator VIP

    This is the only interesting part i was able to get from both demos

    But this video isn't enough to ban someone for hacking. Do you have more demos?
     
  11. Tea♥

    Tea♥ VIP

    At 26 seconds, it's pretty clear that's not normal mouse movement. I suppose I don't have any other evidence, since I thought two demos featuring 5+ kills of someone who is blatantly cheating would be obvious. Guess I should only report spinbots.
     
  12. Tea♥

    Tea♥ VIP

    Like.. tell me how that kill on scrub isnt aimlock


    Also gonna amend this to say I think they toggled norecoil in the 1st demo
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2020
  13. DarkShiny

    DarkShiny Just guilty me NOW, boi VIP Silver

    no recoil?????
     
  14. Tea♥

    Tea♥ VIP

    The m16 has a lot of recoil, and even with spectator glitches should still be visible, like in the 2nd demo. But the 1st has almost none.
     
  15. Reda-Lex

    Reda-Lex sup, China ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)/ Administrator VIP

    I did look at both demo and didn't see anything else. I also asked some of the other staff members and we agreed that this video alone isn't enough. If you have more evidence let me know.

    The link of this thread will be written in his note. If he comes back, we will keep an eye on him.

    Thank you for posting this report!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.