Accepted Plz remove jihad gba

if u stay and shoot with the group most of time u cross fire kill an inno and fail shooting the t which mean all those ppl are dead, unless if some ppl manage to run and survive from jihad will be less kill for him and will help innos win the round.

 

+1
Been killed for this before.

 

I often solo people using them. So why can't a group do it? If you run from a jihad I'll 100% assume you're a T.

 

-1

Though i never kill people who run from jihads because i don't consider this just sets off the fight or flight response, i do not agree this rule should be removed though. You are ignoring a traitorous act that can be stopped by killing the person. i have stopped multiple Jihads with a single headshot with an M14 or an HKSL8. And more times than not a T jihading a group would die if everyone opened fire. Yes you kill or damage an inno in crossfire, but damaging or killing a single inno is worth the majority of them coming out alive. where as if everyone ran away its far more likely for the jihad to go off and kill multiple.

Id rather die in crossfire than let a T get a jihad off. I can see how running from a jihad would be seen as GBA as you are allowing someone to endanger innos. I believe the rule should remain as it is, if you have time to focus on running away, which you may not even be able to escape from anyways, then you should have time to focus on the person jihading and helping to stop it.

 

Look at this from the other side of the fence: Other than being an RDMer, what reason would traitors have to jihad a group of people that contains their fellow T buddies? If they leave during the jihad, they are more than likely trying to get away. If they leave just before the jihad, they might be a traitor and warrant a closer watch on their actions to see if they do anything traitorous.

 

. i never saw a t jihad on group where his t buddys in there
. most of time traitors don't jihad when 1 guy is around them
. 90% of jihading always Succeed bs its kinda hard to kill the jihader on a group bs ppl is covering him and they freak out to run
. jihad is a 2 sec t act so if u miss 1 bullet ur done so u prefer to run
. always ppl who get jihad gba are innos
. most of ppl don't have the aim of xproplayer to 1 tap the jihad tbh

 

If i give plenty of warnings i will jihad near my T buddys. Screw karma at that point they are preventing me from getting kills.

 

ey

 

I can accept other arguments for this, but the simple argument that you can kill jihaders so you expect others to as well is a horrible one. We don't base our rules off those with good reflexes, or by thos who have skill for a reason. (5 second rule?) I support this suggestion because the kills made in this instance are generally just toxic and needless, and most players aren't fast enough to react and simply don't want to die so they do what they can.

 

More like .5 second rule. Because that's about how long it takes before certain people assume you're GBA for not doing anything.

 

-1 Myriad and avuky summed up all the points.
Also just a side note, please people, if someone is jihading, shoot him. You can walk and shoot at the same time. If you're inevitably gonna die anyways, take your chances maybe you get a good shot.

 

Not everyone uses powerful guns such as AK or HK416 to shutdown someone within 2 seconds, also jihads are generally caused in large crowds, so there is confusion as to who is jihading.

Also +1

 

If someone starts jihading, I'll shoot if there is no option. If on teenroom, and its up on the entertainment center, ill definitely hide my ass behind the cop car, or in the vent.

 

Player A is an asshole and wants to shoot Player B.
Player C jihads, dies.
Player A can now shoot Player B no matter what.

This is stupid. Player A is stupid. You're stupid.

 

I think you all are forgetting the fact that, in large player groups, it's extremely hard to see who's using the jihad. People naturally freak out as soon as they hear the sound and it gets messy real quick. If I just sprayed in the general direction, I'd probably kill more innos rather than the T. I'm one of those people who prefers running away just because it's usually hard to react in such a short time (smaller groups being an exception) and I can clearly see that I have higher chances of surviving by hiding around a corner rather than shooting.

 

so that means dont group.And learn bhop to get away faster.

 

+1 I normally try to kill but if a wall is near I may hide. Kinda dumb to be GBA for running away from certain death.

 

this does seem like a really good idea; it's not realistic to assume that everyone can react and shoot at the person when their own life is in danger.

 

Nothing stop you from shooting and moving backward. People will say dumb shit like jihad GBA is toxic but I find not shooting a jihader as an inno/d to be what's truly toxic. You have a chance to save lives and contribute to your team but instead you cower trying to save only your hide. Doing so only help the traitors win and I probably have slower reaction times than most people here in this thread because of my autism. Why can I do it but you guys can't? Nothing stop you from shooting while backing up if you have to. There's no way in most case you'll get away from the jihad range since it's 2 to 3 time the range of a frag. Unless you were near a map element like a cop car or a wall corner. In which case you had a safe spot and could have helped but chose not to and this is why you're GBA. Not because you run from it but because you chose to not act on the traitorous act being commited. I also really dislike how you are all saying you can't spot a jihad when there is a flashy animation surrounding the player jihading.

 

If you isolate yourself it allows the traitors to get ez picks